This website uses cookies or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalized recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy
Affiliation: Doctoral candidate of Caucasus International University, Guest lecturer of the same university
Abstract: The rights and duties of the director in entrepreneurial activities are regulated by both the 1994 and 2021 editions of the Law of Georgia “On Entrepreneurs”. The powers assigned to him/her include leadership and representation of the entrepreneurial company. The legal relations of the director often goes beyond the scope of corporate law. Accordingly, the rights and duties established by other fields of law apply to him. One of them is the law of insolvency, which provides for the director’s involvement in such a regime as the rehabilitation regime. In the paper, the role of the director is considered within the framework of the regulation of the law of insolvency, the rehabilitation regime, which is regulated by the law of insolvency. In addition to reacting to the imperatively determined action, the law obliges the director to assess the evaluable and foreseeable circumstances and to take appropriate action on it. The topic is relevant and interesting, because in addition to the civil liability towards the director, criminal liability may also be considered. In order to properly discuss the topic provided by the article, the laws on Insolvency Procedings and on Rehabilitation and Collective Satisfaction of Creditors are compared with each other. Decisions/rulings of the general courts of Georgia have been used in the paper in order to clarify the position of the court regarding the issue. And, in certain cases, the legal norms of different countries and foreign language literature are cited in the article for the purpose of making a comparison.
@article{ Ketiladze: 2022,
doi = {10.36475/8.4.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.36475%2F8.4.11},
year = 2022,
month = {dec},
publisher = {European University Institute of Law},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {172--187},
title = {A {PERSON} {AUTHORIZED} {TO} {MANAGE} {AND}
{REPRESENT} A {DEBTOR} {COMMUNITY} {IN}
{THE} {REGIME} {OF} {REHABILITATION}},
journal = { Law and World }
}
×
TY - JOUR
AU – Ketiladze M.
DO - 10.36475/8.4.11
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.36475/8.4.11
TI - A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A
DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION
T2 - Law and World
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/12/28
PB - European University Institute of Law
SP - 172-187
IS - 4
VL - 8
SN - 2587-5043
SN - 2346-7916
ER -
×
Ketiladze, M. A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION. (2022). Law and World , 8(4), 172–187. Internet Archive. https://doi.org/10.36475/8.4.11
×
Ketiladze M, (2022) ‘A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION’. Law and World , 8(4), pp. 172–187. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.36475/8.4.10
×
Ketiladze, Meri. “A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION.” Law and World 8, no. 4 (December 28, 2022): 172–87. https://doi.org/10.36475/8.4.11
×
[1]M. Ketiladze “A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION,” Law and World , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 172–187, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.36475/8.4.11.
×
Ketiladze M, A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION. Law and World [Internet]. 2022 Dec 28;8(4):172–87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.36475/8.4.11
×
Meri Ketiladze, “A PERSON AUTHORIZED TO MANAGE AND REPRESENT A DEBTOR COMMUNITY IN THE REGIME OF REHABILITATION.” Law and World 8, no. 4 (December 28, 2022): 172–87. https://doi.org/10.36475/8.4.11
Chanturia L., Ninidze, T., (2002). Commentary on the Law on Entrepreneurs, 3rd edition.
Exposure of Managing Directors of Austrian Corporate Entities in Times of COVID-19, February 2, 2022.
Fisch., (2000). The Peculiar Role of the Delaware Courts in the Competition for Corporate Charters, University of Cincinnati Law Review.
Jugeli G., (2010). Protection of capital in a joint-stock company, Tbilisi.
Lazarishvili L., (2009). Official contract with the director of the company, Theoretical and practical issues of modern corporate law, Tbilisi, publishing house: Meridiani; Tinatin Tsereteli State and Law Institute
Makharoblishvili G., (2015). General analysis of corporate governance, (comparative legal research) Tbilisi, Journal: World of Lawyers.
Martinez G., (2017). Re-Examining the Law and Economics of the Business Judgment Rule: Notes for its Implementation in Non-US jurisdictions, Working Paper Series.
Millaudon v P., (2019). 8 Mart. (n. s.) 68, 77-78 (La. Supreme Court, 1829); Criddle, Miller & Sitkoff, the Oxford handbook of fiduciary law.
Migriauli, R., (2021). Brief guide to entrepreneurial law. Tbilisi, publishing house: Sezani.
Migriauli R., (2016). Issues of Georgian private law, Second completed edition, Tbilisi.
Migriauli, R., (2003). Origin and termination of the legal relationship between the limited liability company and the director, Journal: Notariat, Notarial and Private Law Review N1.
Meskhisvili, K. et al., (2021). Fundamentals of In-solvency Proceedings under the Law of Georgia On Rehabilitation and Collective Satisfaction of Creditors, Tbilisi, publishing house: GIZ.
Schnitger H., Migriauli R., (2011). Insolvency Law., Characterization and comparison with Georgian bankruptcy law and international standards, Tbilisi, publishing house: Siesta.
Shalchi A., (2022). Directors' responsibilities during insolvency, House of Commons Library.
Shalchi A., (2021). Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, House of Commons Library
Jugeli G., (2010). Capital Protection Shareholder In the community, Tbilisi. p.271
Meskhishvili K., Batlidze g., Amisulashvili N., Jorbenadze S., (2021). Insolvency case production Basics of rehabilitation and of creditors collective satisfaction About Georgia _ of the law According to, publishing house: GIZ, Tbilisi. p. 29. http://lawlibrary.info/ge/books/ GIZ_Insolvency-reader_2021.pdf
The Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, Article 51.
Makharoblishvili G., (2015). Corporations management general Analysis, (comparatively – legal research) Tbilisi, Publishing house: Lawyers the world p.92.
Bakakuri N., Gelter M., Tsertsvadze L., Jugeli G., (2019). corporate law manual for lawyers. p.200.
Shalchi A., (2022). Directors' responsibilities during insolvency, House of Commons Library. p.4
Shalchi A., (2021). Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020, House of Commons Library. p.21.
Explanatory Rehabilitation card and of creditors collective satisfaction About Georgia _ of the law on the project. p.8.
Rehabilitation and of creditors collective satisfaction about Law, Article 44.1.
Rehabilitation and of creditors collective satisfaction about Law, article 18.1 and paragraph 2
Rehabilitation and of creditors collective satisfaction about Law, Article 18.3
Rehabilitation and of creditors collective satisfaction about Law, Article 44.2.
The Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, Article 9.9. consolidated Version – 15.07.2020.
Rehabilitation and of creditors collective satisfaction about Law, Article 16.1.
Millaudon V P., (2019). 8 Mart. (ns) 68, 77–78 (La. Supreme Court, 1829); Criddle, Miller & Sitkoff, the Oxford handbook of fiduciary law. p.877.
Fisch, (2000). The Peculiar Role of the Delaware Courts in the Competition for Corporate Charters, University of Cincinnati Law Review. p.1063.
Martinez G., (2017). Re-Examining the Law and Economics of the Business Judgment Rule: Notes for its Implementation in Non-US jurisdictions, Working Paper Series. p.5.
Judgment of Tbilisi City Court of January 17, 2018, case No. 2/25704-15.
Migriauli R., (2021). Entrepreneurial of law short Textbook, Tbilisi, publishing house: Sezani. p.111-113
Law on Insolvency Proceedings, Article, 44.4.
Chanturia L., Ninidze T., (2002). Commentary on the Law on Entrepreneurs, 3rd edition. p.303.
Migriauli R., (2003). Origin and termination of the legal relationship between the limited liability company and the director, Journal: Notariat, Notarial and Private Law Review N1. p. 36.
Lazarishvili L., (2009). official contract of the company with the director Modern corporate of law theoretical and practical Issues, Tbilisi, publishing house: Meridiani; Tinatin Tsereteli State and Law Institute. p.309.
Schnitgeri H., Migriauli R., (2011) Insolvency Law, Characterization and Comparison with Georgian Bankruptcy Law and International Standards, Tbilisi. p.12.