 |
| doi.org/10.36475/L.A.W.14 |
| ABBREVIATED TITLE |
| L.A.W. |
| Issue |
| Online version |
| Print version |
| Last issues |
In this Article
Volume 8, issue 4
Restriction of the freedom of will of individuals by moral norms
Affiliation: 3rd Year Student of the Bachelors Program in Law at the Faculty of Law of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
Abstract: moral norms date back centuries. In a specific time and space, morality took a higher place than codified legal norms. The devel- opment of law has led to the fact that today codified acts have a predominant place in legal proceedings, although due to the im- portant place of moral rules in society, the legislator did not deny its importance in the Civil Code of Georgia. On the one hand, taking into account the role of morality in so- ciety and reinforcing its importance with the Civil Code is a posi- tive fact, however, on the other hand, it is important to assess how correct it is to reinforce it in its current form, as well as how much power it gives the court in order to limit the fate of transactions con- cluded within the autonomy of the will of individuals. While the consideration of moral rules should respond to the demands of society, its abstract and unclear content creates the possibility of excessively restricting the freedom of individuals when concluding a contract with the norms of morality unknown to a person. By discussing the selected issue, it becomes possible to analyze and evaluate the challenges and problems in Georgian litigation. The question to be discussed is: is the strengthening of morality a positive factor, or it can negatively affect the fate of the deals made by the autonomy of the will of individuals and limit their freedom.
Keywords: Morality, Autonomy of the will of persons, Problems,
Language: GE
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Normative Materials:
- Civil Code of Georgia, 1997.
- German Civil Code, 1900.
- Civil Law Code of the Soviet Socialist Republic of Georgia, 1964.
- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950.
Scientific Literature:
- Gogelia G., (2005). Law, Authority and Morality in Modern Legal Positivism, Man and the Constitution, IV.
- Zarandia T./Jugeli T., (2006). Moral Obligations in Civil Law, Justice and Law, IV.
- Zoidze B., (2005). Reception of European private law in Georgia, Tbilisi.
- Zoidze B., (2013). An attempt to know the practical existence of law mainly from the perspective of human rights, Tbilisi.
- Cropholer I., (2014). German Civil Code, Darjania T., Chechelashvili Z. (Translator), Chachanidze E., Darjania T., Totladze L. (ed.), 13th edition, Tbilisi.
- Metreveli V., (2009). Roman law (fundamentals), Tbilisi.
- Ghvinashvili G., (2019). Forced transaction in judicial practice and its separation from immoral transactions, Tbilisi, master's thesis, available https://openscience.ge/bitstream/1/1028/1/samagistro%20gviniashvili.pdf
- Chanturia L., (2011). General part of civil law, Tbilisi
- Chanturia L., (2017). Commentary on the Civil Code, Book I, General Provisions of the Civil Code, Tbilisi.
- Khubua G., (2015). Theory of Law, Tbilisi.
- Zorbenadze S., Akhvlediani Z., Zoidze B., Ninidze T., Chanturia L., (2002). Commentary on the Civil Code of Georgia, book one, Tbilisi.
- Zorbenadze S., (2011). Error in Bargaining, Parallel to Other Legal Institutions, Law Journal, II.
- Zorbenadze S., (2016). The Scope of Freedom of Contract in Civil Law, Tbilisi, Dissertation for the Academic Degree of Doctor of Laws, available at http://press.tsu.ge/data/image_db_innova/ disertaciebi_samartali/sergi_jorbenadze.pdf
- Moka-Mubelo W., (2015). Reconciling Law and Horality in human Rights Discourse: Beyond the Habermasian Account of Human Rights, a dissertation, Bosston College.
- Raz J., (2003). about Morality and the Nature of Law, the American Journal of Jurisprudence, I.
Court Decisions:
- Decision No. 2/13966-12 of Tbilisi City Court of February 5, 2013.
- Decision No. 2b/4123-12 of the Tbilisi Court of Appeal dated February 6, 2013
- Judgment No. 2b/4686-13 of the Tbilisi Court of Appeal dated April 15, 2014.
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia dated March 01, 2016 No. AS-15-15-2016.
- Decision No. As-664-635-2016 of the Supreme Court of Georgia dated March 2, 2017.
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia dated August 2, 2019 No. AS-33-33-2018.
Notes:
- Metreveli V., (2009). Roman law (fundamentals), Tbilisi, p. 72.
- Chanturia L., (2011). General part of civil law, Tbilisi, p. 354.
- Ibid., p. 354.
- Khubua G., (2015). Theory of Law, Tbilisi, p. 79.
- Chanturia L., (2011). General part of civil law, Tbilisi, p. 356–357.
- Khubua G., (2015). Theory of Law, Tbilisi, p. 79.
- Cropholler I., (2014). German Civil Code, educational commentary, Tbilisi, p. 63
- Moka-Mubelo W., (2015). Reconciling Law and Orality in Human Rights Discourse: Beyond the Habermasian Account of Human Rights, a dissertation, Bosston College, p.130.
- Khubua G., (2015). Theory of Law, Tbilisi, p. 78
- Raz J., (2003). About Morality and the Nature of Law, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, I, p. 1.
- Gogelia G., (2005). Law, Authority and Morality in Modern Legal Positivism, Man and the Constitution, IV, p. 89.
- Zoidze B., (2005). Reception of European private law in Georgia, Tbilisi, p. 214.
- Ibid., 215.
- Ghvinashvili G., (2019). Forced transaction in court practice and its separation from immoral transactions, Tbilisi, p. 56. Master thesis, available at https://openscience.ge/ bitstream/1/1028/1/samagistro%20gviniashvili.pdf
- Zoidze B., (2013). An attempt to recognize the practical existence of law mainly from the point of view of human rights, Essays, Tbilisi, p. 23.
- Ibid., p. 204.
- Zorbenadze S., Akhvlediani Z., Zoidze B., Ninidze T., Chanturia L., (2002). Commentary on the Civil Code of Georgia, book one, Tbilisi, p. 177.
- Ibid., p. 181.
- Ibid., p. 322
- Chanturia L., (2017). Commentary on the Civil Code, Book I, General Provisions of the Civil Code, Tbilisi, p. 312.
- Ibid., p. 66.
- Chanturia L., (2011). General part of civil law, Tbilisi, p. 354.
- Ibid., p. 321.
- Zorbenadze S., (2016). Scope of freedom of contract in civil law, Tbilisi, p. 96. Dissertation for the academic degree of Doctor of Laws, available at http://press.tsu.ge/data/image_db_innova/disertaciebi_samartali/sergi_jorbenadze.pdf
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia of March 01, 2016 No. AS-15-15-2016.
- Cropholer I., (2014). German Civil Code, Darjania T., Chechelashvili Z. (Translator), Chachanidze E., Totladze L. (ed.), 13th edition, Tbilisi, p. 63.
- Decision No. 2/13966-12 of Tbilisi City Court of February 5, 2013.
- Decision No. 2b/4123-12 of the Tbilisi Court of Appeal dated February 6, 2013
- Ghvinashvili G., Forced transaction in court practice and its separation from immoral transaction, Tbilisi, 2019, p. 59. Master thesis, available at https://openscience.ge/bitstream/1/1028/1/samagistro%20gviniashvili.pdf
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia dated March 2, 2017 No. AS-664-635-2016.
- Zorbenadze S., Error in the transaction, parallel to other legal institutions, Journal of Law, II, 2011, p. 206
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia dated August 2, 2019 No. AS-33-33-2018.
- Judgment of Tbilisi Court of Appeal No. 2b/4686-13 of April 15, 2014.
- Zarandia T./Jugeli T., Moral Obligations in Civil Law, Justice and Law, IV, 2006, p. 77.
- Chanturia L., General part of civil law, Tbilisi, 2011, p. 355.
Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved