PROBLEM OF GUILT AND INTEGRITY OF ITS FORMS IN COURT

Abstract

In the report the following thesis is proved, that the term “indifferent” is divided with regard to the forms of guilt and is the sign of irresponsibility of a person before the state. In particular, in case of direct intent person foresees inevitability of an unlawful consequence, however he/she does not want it, but by uncertain motivations he/she accepts it or indifferently treats the outcome. The concept of indifference is leading in the notion of the eventual intention, and this indifference is expressed by the negligence as well (official indifference – Criminal Code of Georgia (CCG) Article 342) and specifically also – by complacency.