INTERRELATION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PRIVATE MEDIATION, THE NEED TO DIFFERENTIATE THE COURT MEDIATION FORMS IN GEORGIA AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUDGE DURING ADMINISTRATION OF THE EACH SINGLE FORM

Kakha Kurashvili

Digital Object Identifier

doi.org/10.36475/L.A.W.14

Abbreviated Title

L.A.W.

Issue

Online version

Print version

Volume 4, Issue 1

INTERRELATION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PRIVATE MEDIATION, THE NEED TO DIFFERENTIATE THE COURT MEDIATION FORMS IN GEORGIA AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUDGE DURING ADMINISTRATION OF THE EACH SINGLE FORM

Authors: Kakha Kurashvili

Affiliation: Doctoral student of Caucasus International University, Invited lecturer of the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Abstract: The article discusses the problem of separation of legal form of response to administrative offense from the legal form of police prevention measures. The Code of Administrative Offenses of Georgia does not define legal forms of response to administrative violations and, therefore, the police uses legal forms of response defined by the Code of Administrative Offenses of Georgia as preventive measures and response measures to Administrative Offences.

Keywords: Governance, Prevention, Separation,

Download

Publication Fee

Free-of-charge

Editor in Chief

Ioseb Kelenjeridze

Publishing Language

English

Georgian

Cookie Consent

In This Article

Volume 4, Issue 1

INTERRELATION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PRIVATE MEDIATION, THE NEED TO DIFFERENTIATE THE COURT MEDIATION FORMS IN GEORGIA AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUDGE DURING ADMINISTRATION OF THE EACH SINGLE FORM

Cookie Consent

In This Article

Volume 4, Issue 1

INTERRELATION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PRIVATE MEDIATION, THE NEED TO DIFFERENTIATE THE COURT MEDIATION FORMS IN GEORGIA AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUDGE DURING ADMINISTRATION OF THE EACH SINGLE FORM

Cite this article:

Copied!

Matrics:

Citations: